| THE
BILLING PROCESS
Transforming
a clinical service into income requires managing tens of thousands
of transactions with hundreds of thousands of data elements. In
order to make the difference between mediocre and outstanding collection
performance, an effective and efficient billing process is required.
The
following are the various tools needed to implement effective billing
and collection:
Demographics.
Accurate patient demographics, including personal and insurance
information, need to be obtained and maintained for effective billing
and collection. Patients demographic information should be checked
when they make their appointments and when they arrive at the office.
Using your denials log (see below), monitor the rate of claims denial
resulting from inaccurate insurance or patient information.
Charge
Capture. This topic was covered in issue #1 (April 1999) of
this newsletter. It is critical to continue to monitor the effectiveness
of your charge capture ratio. Remember, the collection ratio for
a clinical service that was not charged is ZERO.
Batching.
This provides controls over sets of data, assuring that all information
leaving one step in the billing process reaches the next step intact
and complete.
The
steps in the billing process that should be monitored by batching
include:
-
Charge ticket generation
-
Patient "arriving"
-
Charge ticket receipt (after patient is seen)
-
Charge entry (into the computer system)
It
is ideal if the charge tickets are sequentially numbered. "Walk-ins"
and "work-ins" should have charge tickets generated by your computer
or by hand.
During
the patients visit, the physician or other clinician marks the
CPT and ICD-9 codes on the charge ticket and forwards it on to the
next step in the process.
"No-shows,"
cancellations, or reschedules have their charge tickets transferred
to the location where the tickets are turned in at the completion
of the patient visit. Charge tickets left for "un-arrived" patients
are reconciled and transferred to the "completed visit" area.
At
the end of the day, missing tickets are identified and the physician
who saw the patient is queried to locate the missing ticket.
After
all tickets are accounted for at the end of the day, the next batching
process is initiated: the transfer of the charges from patient checkout
to charge entry. This transmission requires control of not only
each ticket, but also of all the charges marked on each ticket.
This is especially important if the billing operation is at a different
location from where the clinical services are provided.
There
are various methods of batching at this stage. Since you must assure
that all of the contents of each document are received and correctly
entered into the billing system, the batching method must be more
comprehensive.
The
two most common methods are totaling the charges for the batch of
charge tickets or totaling the CPT codes (e.g., 99212 + 99214 =
198,426). If either of these methods is used, the charge tickets,
line items of charges, and the total dollars sent from patient checkout
can be reconciled with the charges entered.
As
charge entry occurs, any changes are accounted for (such as changed,
added, or deleted codes), and the batch total entered in the billing
system is reconciled with the total sent from the patient checkout
area.
This
process assures that a charge ticket is received for each patient
and all of the charges on the ticket are entered into the billing
system.
Cash
Management. While only a small percentage of an Ophthalmology
practice's income is paid in the office, and only a fraction of
those payments are in cash, the cash represents a disproportionately
complex problem. (The March 1999 Network Update Issue #10 has a
full discussion on cash control issues.) Some tips for successful
cash management include:
1. Use numbered receipts for cash payments and include a reconciliation
for receipt copies at the end-of-day procedures;
2. Do not leave cash in the office overnight. Have someone write
a check for the cash each evening;
3. Encourage patients use of credit cards or checks to reduce
cash collections. Payment Posting. This is perhaps the most critical
aspect of the billing process. The key to optimal payment posting
is a system that assists the staff in evaluating the adequacy
of the payment and the disposition of the balance.
-
Should the patient be billed?
-
Does the health insurance coverage require a write-off?
-
Should there be a supplemental insurance billing?
The
ideal is a computer billing system that has the major payor allowable
payment schedules loaded in, as well as each plan's rules regarding
the disposition of any balance after the plan pays. If your computer
system doesn't reach this ideal, you can develop a manual system.
Use either a handwritten or computer spreadsheet to produce a master
matrix of the allowable payment by insurance plan for most CPT codes.
|
CPT
|
Medicare
|
Medicaid
|
PPO
1
|
PPO
2
|
HMO
1
|
HMO
2
|
|
92002
|
$67
|
$38
|
$73
|
$71
|
$69
|
$75
|
|
92004
|
$115
|
$65
|
$122
|
$119
|
$118
|
$125
|
|
92012
|
$60
|
$32
|
$68
|
$65
|
$62
|
$71
|
Denials
Log. Track any denied or downcoded claims. This does not have
to be a complex computer program (although a simple spreadsheet
does a nice job). A spiral notebook will suffice.
The
column format could be:
|
Pt.
I.D.
|
Insurance
Plan
|
Rejection
Category1
|
Date
of Service
|
Date
Rejection Received
|
Action
|
Result
Due Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your
billing staff works the claims to resolution as always, but on a
monthly basis you can review the log to identify patterns.
For
instance, if there is a large number of claims rejected for patients
not being covered by the insurer, you may have a problem in your
registration process. If you begin to get a large number of rejections
from Medicare for "not medically necessary" services, you probably
have a problem in your ICD-9 coding, most likely from a changed
Medicare policy. If you are getting increasing requests for operative
notes, you may want to start sending them with the original claim.
While
you may have a "sense" that claims are being rejected, a quantified
analysis of the number of and reasons for the rejections is invaluable
information.
Follow-Up
Tracking
-
How do you know when a payment is overdue?
- Does
your billing computer alert you?
- Is
that alert simply your AR Summary/Aged Trial Balance?
- Is
it a more refined list of claims or accounts over 30 or 60 days?
-
Do you have an alert system that is adjustable by payor?
A
claim not paid in 30 days by an out-of-state indemnity insurer is
different from a payment not received for an electronically submitted
claim to your local Medicare carrier.
-
Once a claim falls into a follow-up category, does your system
track that follow-up process?
Most
systems do not track that process well, but the volume of those
claims is relatively low (or at least should be low - if the volume
is high, your denials log should tell you what adjustments are needed
in your billing process, or who your problem payors are). With this
low volume, a manual tracking system can be used.
A
set of three 30-slot accordion folders can be used for a "tickler"
file, with a claim needing follow-up placed in a date slot to remind
you when an action is expected. By checking the file each day for
claims remaining in that day's slot, unpaid claims will not be lost
in the billing process.
Performance
Monitoring. There are several ways to measure billing performance,
and they fall into two categories: process and outcome.
Outcome
measurements include gross collection ratio and days in AR. Calculation
of these two measures will be covered in a future newsletter issue.
Process
monitoring includes measurements such as the average lag time between
date of service and date of claim submission, the number of charges
entered per staff member per day, etc.
Summary
The billing process has to be looked at from two perspectives
how do you get a specific claim paid in the right amount at the
right time, and how do you monitor the entire process to assure
that all of your claims are being paid in the right amount at the
right time. The former requires accurate information and anticipation
and review of the payment. The latter requires systems of evaluation
and review of workflow and business processes to assure expected
performance.
Ron
Rosenberg, P.A., MPH, Author Practice Management Resource Group
Irene Chriss, Editor Director, AAO Practice Management Department
|